Read the latest InSight edition:


Assessing the Opposition

by James Arvanitakis

There is an old adage in politics that a Government is only as good as the Opposition. I would like to believe it to be true – but I get the feeling that the Opposition is only as good as the Government allows them to be. That is, if a Government is doing well, then most of us, the media, tend to ignore the Opposition. The exception seems to be if the Opposition is imploding, plotting leadership challenges or doing so badly, they become a curiosity (thank you Brendan Nelson and Simon Crean).

The rise and rise of Kevin Rudd as Opposition leader, for example, seemed to coincide with the decline of the Howard Government. While Howard tried to convince us of his vigour, the curtain was eventually pulled back and he merely looked like the unmasked Wizard of Oz.

With Peter Costello picking up his ball and going home, and Malcolm Turnbull making decent headway in the polls, it is time to assess the quality of the Opposition. While we can look at any number of policy challenges facing the Opposition, let’s focus on three.

The first is Opposition’s response to the budget. It is here that Turnbull has achieved the most traction, confidently reproaching the government for the size of deficit. Turnbull has done well in portraying the Government as irresponsible, but has failed to tell us what is wrong with deficits as a counter-cyclical mechanism.

The second issue has been the response to climate change. While Rudd and Penny Wong have failed to convince anyone that the Emissions Trading Scheme is good for anything, the best that the Opposition has come up with is to wait: but wait for what exactly? Turnbull has allowed the sceptics of his party to undermine any attempt to achieve any structural change and in doing so, failed to promote an alternative policy initiative.

Thirdly, we should not forget Turnbull’s (atrocious) behaviour when he suggested that the Government should bring back ‘Temporary Protection Visas’. At a time when race tensions continue to bubble underneath the surface, such a move shows a distinct lack of moral leadership.

A decent Opposition or a Government losing some shine? Not sure, but Costello’s departure should be used as an opportunity to shake up his party. Otherwise, they might as well have kept John Howard.


About the author

Comments

The opposition

Turnbull surely has laid himself open to the charge of being more concerned with gaining power rather than aiding in Australia's problems. Maybe he remembered the Wheat debacle or the revealed falsity of the Iraq affair or maybe just hurt pride.
He must know that the debt has already been created by the honest market players whose honesty I must admit is hidden by a continuing belief in the market, though granted in one sense the Government could be seen as creating debt for Australia. Politicians being of the moment not history buffs might be forgiven for neglecting the fact that dislike of deficit is said deepened and lengthened the depression. He could of course have gone further and noted that many writers regard the deficit financing due to war rather than the New Deal as ending the depression.

Assessing the Opposition

peacenow
I don't think that either of the major parties have many good policies. Turnbull seems to object to any ALP policy and I am sure that the ALP would object to any policy that Turnbull proposed (if he ever proposes a policy.

Neither party seems to have a vision for Australia and that is what we really need in our major parties.


This site is the home of the Centre for Policy Development. It is kindly hosted for us by .
Contact us if you'd like to know more about what you see here.