Australians are becoming more aware of the dangers of political parties chasing more frequent contributions from donors and of uncontrolled spending in election campaigns. The media regularly reports on government decisions that favour the interests of companies that fill the coffers both of the parties in power and the often-compliant opposition parties.
Electoral funding is crucial to our democratic processes. The Greens' research on political donations during the past six years and our participation in various forums on donations and electoral funding has led us to the conclusion that radical reform is needed.
Image courtesy of Michael Orange.
Further, a number of leading members of both major parties have spoken of the need for changes to political party funding: Paul Keating, Carmen Lawrence, Eric Roozendaal (NSW government minister) and Don Harwin (NSW Upper House Liberal Whip) have all voiced their concerns.
So it was disappointing that in the recent federal election campaign the issue of political donations was ignored by the major parties. These parties were busy handing out our money in the hope of winning more votes. The Greens raised concerns about rampant fund raising by the major parties for their expensive campaigns and lack of transparency in that process. But unfortunately the issue was lost in the vote buying ritual of our elections.During the federal election the Greens called for a national summit on political donations to explore all options for reforming electoral funding. Unlike the Coalition parties, Labor has a history of supporting reform in this area. With Labor in power, a Rudd government would be wise to call such a summit.
The key issues that such a summit would cover include transparency of donations to political parties, capping of donations and electoral expenditure, and the role for private donations to political parties.
Transparency of donations is a hot topic as the Howard government's change to the disclosure threshold of donations effective 8 December 2005 has been disastrous.
Prior to that date, all donations of $1,500 and above to registered parties had to be reported to the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) every financial year. After that date the disclosure threshold rose to over $10,000 adjusted each year to the CPI. The current disclosure threshold is $10,500.
This means that thousands of donations accounting for millions of dollars are now never disclosed to the public. This secrecy is dangerous in any democracy since the public must be aware of who is paying to potentially influence governmental policies.
It is true that there have been major problems with transparency due to loop holes in the federal disclosure laws for years, but what the Howard government did in December 2005 was about securing more funding by allowing their backers to give large donations secretly.
Capping of donations and expenditure is important since currently we are on our way to an American system of big money politics where the only way to be elected is to buy your way into office. Other countries have capped the amount of money that can be given to political parties, as well as the amount spent on election campaigns, such as Canada.
The following are the three main issues that need to be considered at a national summit. Under each of these issues we have given recommendations we believe would lead to a more transparent electoral system that will not be dominated by a quest for larger and larger donations from groups that stand to benefit from access to our political leaders:
Transparency
Capping of Donations and Election Expenditure
Role of Private Donations to Political Parties
Canada has banned all donations to parties from corporations, unions and other organisations. Canadian law only allows capped donations from individuals. We must consider such a step in Australia since it removes the possibility of buying influence by large companies, unions and organisations such as lobby groups.
A national debate on this critical issue is now needed.
|
<!--adsense: cached--> |