"The aim of Government 2.0 is to make government information more accessible and useable, to make government more consultative, participatory and transparent, to build a culture of online innovation, and to promote collaboration across agencies in online and information initiatives." Towards Government 2.0: An issues paper, issued by the Government 2.0 Taskforce, 23 July 2009.
"Government 2.0 is the adoption of Web 2.0 social platforms and tools inside government to help improve citizen engagement and collaboration between government and citizens." http://localgov2.wordpress.com/2009/01/14/how-would-you-define-government-20/, 22 August 2009
"Government 2.0 is not specifically about social networking or technology based approaches to anything. It represents a fundamental shift in the implementation of government - toward an open, collaborative, cooperative arrangement where there is (wherever possible) open consultation, open data, shared knowledge, mutual acknowledgment of expertise, mutual respect for shared values and an understanding of how to agree to disagree. Technology and social tools are an important part of this change but are essentially an enabler in this process." http://groups.google.com.au/group/gov20canberra , 22 August 2009
"Authoritarian imposition of top-down policy has had its day. Citizens know more about their own communities than bureaucrats, and more about society than politicians. This age of ever-increasing connectivity obliges the Government to interact constructively with the community before and during policy development, rather than continuing the practice of dreaming policies up behind closed doors and only releasing them for public comment after the decision to implement them has already been made." ( Mark Newton, New Matilda, 25 June 2009: http://newmatilda.com/2009/06/25/lessons-censorship-china-and-iran)
"I rather liked the [definition] a colleague of mine, Bill Gaylor (Public Sector Architect at Microsoft) spotted on GovLoop - Next Generation Government: Mobile, Measurable, Malleable
http://blogs.msdn.com/james_brown/archive/2009/06/23/do-we-have-to-define-gov-2-0.aspx , 22 August 2009
See also Kate Lundy's three pillars of Open Government: Citizen-centric services; Open and transparent government; and Innovation facilitation - http://www.katelundy.com.au/2009/06/20/three-pillars-of-open-government/