Watt Benefits? Ensuring social equity in Australian electricity markets

Overview

ON THIS PAGE

Watt benefits? Ensuring social equity in Australian electricity markets is a report from the Centre for Policy Development (CPD) that outlines ways governments, developers and the energy sector can ensure the energy transition is fair, supports the people and communities affected, and builds social licence for long-term success.

Reaching net zero means nothing short of a complete overhaul of our energy system—rolling out renewables and storage projects at record speed. But this transformation won’t succeed without getting communities and households on board. It’s not enough for people to know they’re doing good for the climate—they need to trust that they will see real social and economic benefits in their everyday lives.

This report lays out a roadmap for ensuring the shift to clean energy is not only fast and effective, but fair for all.

Download Watt Benefits

Watt benefits? Ensuring social equity in Australian electricity markets is a report from the Centre for Policy Development that outlines ways governments, developers and the energy sector can ensure fairness and social license in the energy transition.

Principles for a fair and just transition

CPD’s Just Transition Framework sets out three principles for an inclusive net zero economy:

What does the report suggest?

Building on the Just Transition Framework, the report explores three key themes for ensuring fairness and social license in the energy transition:

  • Creating the policy conditions necessary to ensure that energy prices are no higher than they need to be to support investment;
  • Ensuring regulatory and fiscal policy settings are designed to support households without the means to afford rooftop solar and batteries; and
  • Structuring government support for the energy industry to deliver broad social and economic benefits for Australian society, especially the communities hosting the infrastructure.

Within these themes, the report also makes practical recommendations—from scaling household payments for energy upgrades by income and wealth, to requiring government-supported businesses to deliver social and economic benefits in line with the Community Benefit Principles in the Future Made in Australia legislation.

The report also addresses questions from the National Electricity Market review, which aims to reform Australia’s electricity market to ensure reliability and affordability during the transition to renewable energy.

These changes aim to ensure that policy reforms to energy markets place people at the centre, to guarantee enduring support for the transition.

Why does this matter?

Australia’s energy transition is well underway, with billions in investment already committed to the renewable energy roll out. But change on this scale carries real risks; if it isn’t managed carefully, people and communities could be left worse off.

For the transition to succeed, it must be fair for all. Prices need to be equitable, predictable and transparent for consumers. Communities that host our energy infrastructure need a genuine voice in decisions, and support to manage the flow-on effects of these developments. Ensuring social licence can also mean faster approvals and reduced costs. 

A transition built on these principles won’t just cut emissions—it will also create a stronger, fairer future for people and communities across Australia.

Industry and government roundtable confirms social licence is key to a successful transition

CPD held an online roundtable on ‘Ensuring consumers benefit in the NEM’, which convened representatives from industry, government, regulators, unions, energy experts and civil society, including Tim Nelson, chair of the NEM Review. The discussion was a thoughtful examination of some of the key issues Australia faces in ensuring the energy transition is fair, supports affected people and communities, and builds the social license critical for long-term success.

Together, participants explored some of the issues relevant to equity and social license that have no clear solution, and the actions that governments can take to achieve an equitable and fair energy transition. Below are some of the key themes that emerged from the discussion:

  • There’s no easy fix for energy bill design: Volumetric charges can be relatively easily avoided by those who are “engaged” in the energy market; fixed charges can disadvantage hardship customers and disincentivise investment in consumer energy resources (CER).
  • Many participants called for reforms to the economic regulation of networks: The current approach has a considerable capex bias, and other approaches are possible (such as regulation based on “totex”, or non-network solutions to augment the network).
  • There are clear question marks around how to achieve social outcomes: Some participants thought community benefit criteria should be part of threshold eligibility for a project to enter the Electricity Services Entry Mechanism (ESEM), others argued that these outcomes are better pursued through general planning/licensing frameworks, rather than at the ESEM entry point.

About the authors

Mara Hammerle

Dr Mara Hammerle is senior policy adviser for the Just Transition focus area at the Centre for Policy Development

ON THIS PAGE

Search