Rising expectations of public services cannot be met in the face of blind, across-the-board cuts. Death by a thousand cuts examines recent cuts in the Western Australian and federal public sectors, and highlights some long-term problems resulting for the Commonwealth, WA, and other states and territories.
Many governments in Australia and internationally are choosing to “avoid responsibility” for service shortfalls when making budget savings, by applying across-the-board cuts rather than identifying the services which should be reduced or ceased.
Kathy MacDermott points out that staff engagement itself is a key factor in raising productivity, but that engagement is eroded by government rhetoric which denigrates the public sector in an attempt to justify cuts, and by the cuts themselves’ increasing workloads on remaining staff.
Chris Stone said his research shows the approach to be, “ultimately self-defeating. Not only are the cuts affecting services, they are causing long-term damage to the institutions of government…”
Cuts can exacerbate challenges already affecting workforce capability in the public sector, such as an ageing workforce wherein 23% of WA public servants will reach retirement age in the next 10 years. Skills shortages are becoming apparent in areas such as IT, where recruiting skilled staff is now a problem. The small size of most rural agencies allows less flexibility to absorb across-the-board budget cuts meaning salaries are hit harder in remote areas. The median public sector salary in WA regional areas is $5,554 lower than those in Perth, making the attraction and retention of skilled staff difficult.
Death by a thousand cuts identifies some undesired consequences of indiscriminate cuts, such as:
Death by a thousand cuts argues that ineffective services and less engaged public servants can lower the popularity of the government in power, hamper the enforcement of laws and regulations, and reduce popular engagement with the democratic process.
Death by a thousand cuts gives recommendations to avoid across-the-board cuts, increase public sector productivity through enhanced employee engagement; reduce the loss of corporate knowledge by improved recruitment and staff retention; protect rural services from staffing problems and disproportionate effects of cuts; and encourage innovation by facilitating input from skilled staff. A ‘blunt’ instrument’ method of across-the-board cuts that does not acknowledge the issues at hand will produce budget savings only in the short term, and will create significant long term problems.
Increasingly governments are choosing to take an irresponsible, and ultimately self defeating, approach to budget savings. Rather than identifying ineffective programs and undertaking the political hard work of persuading the public of the advisability of cancelling the service, many politicians and parties institute across-the-board cuts, such as an efficiency dividend or growth cap.
Melbourne: Level 18, 1 Nicholson Street,East Melbourne, VIC, 3002(+61) 03 9752 2771
Sydney: Level 5, 320 Pitt Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000
Media Enquiries: Curtis Moore email@example.com+61 481 334 013
Melbourne: Level 18, 1 Nicholson Street,East Melbourne, VIC, 3002
Design By: WP Creative