Losing the Game: State of our schools in 2017

Overview

ON THIS PAGE

Six years after the recommendations from the original Gonski Review into education were published, Australia is once again on the cusp of major education reform. In early May, the Turnbull Government surprised everyone by proposing a new package of needs-based, sector-blind schools funding for the next decade. David Gonski AC returns to chair another inquiry into achieving excellence in Australia’s classrooms. Since May, there has been extensive discussion about the merits of the reform proposal, and the Australian Education Amendment Bill 2017 is before the Federal Parliament.

Amidst this revitalised national debate, CPD released Losing the game: State of our schools in 2017 on Wednesday 21 June 2017. This new report is co-authored by Fellows Chris Bonnor and Bernie Shepherd, who between them have over 80 years of experience in the public school system. They co-authored the highly influential 2016 CPD report, Uneven Playing Field: The state of Australia’s schools.

Losing the Game is vital and sobering reading for anyone wanting to understand the state of our schools system, and will be required reading for the Second Gonski Review panel. Chris and Bernie examine the key trends in schools funding, performance and student composition, based on an analysis of My School website data for 2010 to 2016. 

Download Losing the Game

Over the last few decades we have seen cycles of debate over the purpose of school education. Who should the system serve?

How should we provide and resource our schools? How do we ensure schools deliver personal and collective achievement?

In answering these questions consensus has been difficult to achieve and even more difficult to sustain.

Key findings:

  • equity in Australia’s schools is declining since the original Gonski Review was released.
  • school intakes are becoming more polarised and socially segregated. Advantaged students move to advantaged schools and strugglers are left behind, literally in classes of their own. 
  • schools are becoming less representative of local communities and less connected to them.
  • the ‘private school’ is vanishing with increased public money but with minimal public obligations.
Losing the Game
Figure 1 shows that government schools enrol the broadest cross-section of students, including the vast majority with higher levels of socio-educational disadvantage (see report p.19).
Figure 2 shows that combined government funding for Catholic and Independent schools (yellow and green bars respectively) tends to be similar to funding for government schools (red) that have a similar socio-educational profile (see report p. 28).

Losing the Game recommends that essential amendments to the package must be made to:

  • accelerate the proposed increases in funding to the most disadvantaged schools, and
  • create a National Schools Resourcing Body to ensure all sectors and levels of government are transparent and accountable.

Additionally, the Second Gonski Review should conduct an investigation into barriers in our current schools framework that risk preventing the implementation of its recommendations. A task force should also be established that monitors progress being made against the recommendations of the Second Gonski Review and the commitments of federal and state governments, and reports publically on them at regular intervals.

In the Media

The gap between high and low socioeconomic high schools is widening as struggling schools are left to support the most disadvantaged students, a new report has found. Research from the Centre for Policy and Development, released on Wednesday, reveals that
The education gulf is widening with the numbers of high achieving HSC students increasingly concentrated in advantaged schools at the expense of disadvantaged schools, new research shows. Aspirational parents are driving the shift as they "trade up" schools for educational institutions
For some the news that arrived in the post earlier this month would have been good, perhaps even life changing. Many more would have disappointed. Each July across NSW the state’s selective high schools notify students who were successful in their
Whenever the selective school debate flares, students at those schools feel picked on. Their only crime is to have worked hard, so to them the discussion feels like an accusation – that they are undeserving, or swindled their way in
Though long regarded as the great equalisers of education, a new study has revealed selective schools are now eclipsing elite, high-fee private schools when it comes to advantage. Over half of the state’s twenty most socio-educationally advantaged schools are now selective,
In the debate about selective schools personal stories and beliefs can drown out evidence, especially when that evidence challenges the status quo. So we hear plenty of anecdotes about the successes of selective school students, but relatively few about the
Selective schools have overtaken private schools as the state's most advantaged, with schools such as Normanhurst Boys and Hornsby Girls now eclipsing elite colleges such as St Ignatius, Barker and Ascham.
The first thing I did when I became a secondary school principal many years ago was to put the school’s prefects in blazers and ties. The school was losing enrolments and needed to improve its profile; prefects were put in
We are now into the tenth anniversary of the strategy to close the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australia. Last week saw a report on progress, a subdued celebration on scattered achievements and copious hand-wringing over endemic failures.

ON THIS PAGE

Search