The state of the Australian Public Service: An alternative report



||SoS Report Cover

The Centre for Policy Development releases The State of the Australian Public Service: An Alternative Report, as part of our Public Service program.

Download the report

The public service agencies and departments of other western democracies are also receiving heightened attention. The bulk of this attention is hostile, ideologically motivated and firmly focused on reducing the size, cost and reach of public service organisations. Perhaps the most dramatic
example of this movement can be seen in the United Kingdom, where Prime Minister David Cameron’s election platform promised an unprecedented dismantling of the nation’s public service.

The State of the Australian Public Service: An Alternative Reports key findings

  • a widening gap between the anti-public servant rhetoric of some politicians and commentators and the positive attitudes held by Australian citizens about public servants and the services they deliver and
  • a decline in the ratio of public servants per capita in contrast to claims of public service ‘bloating’.

Shadow Treasurer Joe Hockey has declared the Coalition’s plans to slash public spending and axe at least 12,000 public servants’ jobs if they gain government at the next election in a rush to bring the budget to surplus. In recent days it has been revealed the Coalition plans to cut public spending by $70 billion, shutting down entire government departments.

The Australian Public Service (APS) employs approximately 160,000 people across 133 agencies, making it one of our largest employers and most significant investments. The staffing of the APS generates heated debate in the media as well as in Parliament. Views are polarised.

But what do we really know about the APS? And does much of the rhetoric match up to the reality?

The State of the Australian Public Service analyses 20 years of opinion research on  the public service. The report finds evidence of a disconnect between frequent public service ‘bashing’ by politicians and commentators and generally positive views of the public sector in the general community.

Most Australians are willing to forego income to pay for public services. There’s a strong preference for services to be provided by the public sector: twice as many people support public over private provision of health and education for example.

Our research into long term staffing trends also contradicts the portrayal by some politicians and media commentators of a public sector that is ‘bloated’.

Unless the community expects less of the public service or the APS is able to deliver its services with significantly fewer employees, the argument that we have a ‘bloated’ public service is baseless.

The State of the Australian Public Service report also finds that the APS is an increasingly top-heavy workforce that does not reflect the diversity of the Australian community, with Indigenous Australians and people with a disability under-represented, and women under-represented in the senior ranks.

Dr James Whelan, the report’s author and Director of CPD’s Public Service Program said, “British Prime Minister David Cameron’s ‘Big Society’ vision entails cutting the public sector budget by ₤80 billion, freezing wages and calling for tenders for most services. At a time when the public service is under attack in the UK, Canada, New Zealand and the US, Australian politicians who are tempted to follow suit should be aware of Australian voters’ strong support for the public sector.”

CPD’s  The State of the Australian Public Service offers an accessible handbook of all you need to know about attitudes toward the public service and staffing trends.

In the Media

The Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) is no friend of public servants or of the idea of public service. They champion privatisation and outsourcing, believing instinctively that the private sector cannot help but maximise efficiency. By their definition, the public
A study of Australia's public service (APS) has found the sector is roughly the same size as it was 20 years ago. The report by the Centre of Policy Development looks at employment trends, community attitudes and political agendas concerning the
THE Coalition may find it harder than it imagines to slash $70 billion from government spending. A report from the Centre for Policy Development - an independently-funded "progressive" think tank - finds the Commonwealth public service no bigger than it was